REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
The Regular Council Meeting was held on June 10, 1996 with Council President Christiansen presiding. Council members present were Mr. Lambert, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Leary, Mr. Truitt, Mrs. Malone, Mr. Fenimore, Mr. Salters and Mr. Hare.
Council staff members present were Chief Smith, Mr. Lucas, Mr. O'Connor, Mr. DePrima, Chief Carey, Mrs. Boaman and Mr. Rodriguez.
OPEN FORUM
The Open Forum was held at 7:15 p.m., prior to commencement of the Official Council Meeting. Council President Christiansen declared the open forum in session and reminded those present that Council is not in official session and cannot take formal action.
Anthony Abbate - Delaware Electric Signal - Parking
Mr. Anthony Abbate, owner of Delaware Electric Signal which is located 145 S. New Street, relayed concern with the parking situation in downtown Dover. Mr. Abbate stated that he had an agreement with Acme to allow his employees and patrons to park in the Acme lot. After Acme moved out, the lot was basically left open for parking. During the past few years, the City Parking Authority has taken over the lot and it is now permit parking and two hour parking. Of the approximately 110 parking spaces, 47 are designated as permit parking. Mr. Abbate stated that the occupancy in the permit section of the lot is down and yet the Parking Authority just recently changed most of the remaining two hour parking spaces to permit only. The remaining two hour parking spaces are located on the far side of the lot. This action has had a detrimental effect on his business. His employees and customers do not feel safe parking on S. New Street and they now cannot park in the Acme lot. Some of his customers have had their vehicles vandalized while parked on S. New Street and many have experienced people sitting on their car.
Mr. Abbate felt that the Parking Authority is out of reach with the reality of those that live and work in the downtown area. The cost of permit parking is extremely high for those that work downtown and it is extremely difficult for customers to find a safe place to park that is not restricted by a two hour limit. Referring to the new ordinance that addresses "surf parking" (prohibits the moving of a vehicle from one space to another in order to avoid the two hour limit), Mr. Abbate stated that it is a ridiculous ordinance. If someone parks in front of the hardware store for an hour and then wishes to go further down the street to have lunch, if they move their car in order to park closer to their next destination, they are ticketed for surf parking even though they may have been downtown for less than two hours. He also complained that there are no signs or markings of any kind to warn parkers of this policy. Mr. Abbate stated that the City is driving away the few patrons that still shop downtown and we must take action to stop it. He suggested that City Council perform an evaluation on whether the Parking Authority has had a positive impact on downtown and if the Authority is really needed. Also, when he attempted to attend the last two Parking Authority meetings, both started 15 to 20 minutes late and he felt that it shows a lack of concern for the public.
Council President Christiansen assured Mr. Abbate that City staff will respond to his questions and concerns.
Mr. Richard Ornauer of 17 Mifflin Road addressed the issue of a full-time Mayor. He noted that the Central Delaware Chamber of Commerce has gone on record as supporting the concept of a full-time Mayor for Dover. Mr. Ornauer requested that City Council give consideration to making the position of Mayor a full-time, paid position. Mayor Hutchison recently accepted additional responsibilities with his employer and is now only available to the public during the evening hours. Mr. Ornauer stated his opinion that the City of Dover is large enough to support a paid Mayor. The business community has relayed their support for a full-time Mayor and he requested that the City Council take the recommendation seriously and reconsider this issue.
The invocation was given by Reverend Joshua Labelo, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
Mr. Salters requested the addition of the following item which was discussed during an earlier Legislative and Finance Committee meeting:
#4C - Purchase of Optical Imaging and Document Retrieval System
Mr. Lambert requested the addition of the following items from an earlier Utility Committee meeting:
#4D - FY96 Resurfacing Program
#4E - One 30-Cubic Yard Automated Side Loading Refuse Collection with Chassis
#4F - Electric Stock Materials
Mr. Fenimore moved for approval of the agenda as amended, seconded by Mr. Lambert and unanimously carried.
ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 1996
The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of June 10, 1996 were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Leary, seconded by Mr. Hare and bore the written approval of Mayor Hutchison.
PROCLAMATION - FLAG DAY - PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The City Clerk read into the record the following Proclamation:
WHEREAS, by Act of Congress of the United States dated June 14, 1777, the first official Flag of the United States was adopted; and
WHEREAS, by Act of Congress dated August 3, 1949, June 14th of each year was designated "NATIONAL FLAG DAY"; and
WHEREAS, the Congress requested the President to annually issue a proclamation designating the week in which June 14th occurs as "NATIONAL FLAG WEEK"; and
WHEREAS, on December 8, 1982, the National Flag Day Foundation was chartered to conduct educational programs and to encourage all Americans to PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE on Flag Day, June 14th; and
WHEREAS, by Act of Congress, Public Law 99-54 was passed to have the PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE as part of the celebration of National Flag Day throughout the nation; and
WHEREAS, Flag Day celebrates our nation's symbol of unity, a democracy in a republic, and stands for our country's devotion to freedom to the rule of all, and to equal rights for all.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, JAMES L. HUTCHISON, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DOVER, do hereby proclaim June 14, 1996, as Flag Day in the City of Dover and urge all citizens to pause at 7:00 P.M. on this date for the Seventeenth Annual "PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE" to the Flag and join all Americans in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America.
PUBLIC HEARING - ELECTRIC FUND BUDGET
A public hearing on the Electric Revenue Fund Budget is required for compliance with the 1985 Electric Revenue (Refunding) Bonds Resolution - Annual Budget Section (as amended by 1990 Bond Resolution) prior to adoption of the budget. Notice of the public hearing was properly advertised.
Mr. O'Connor explained that the budget is basically a maintenance fund, with no major increases in revenue or expenditures other than what is associated with typical growth.
Council President Christiansen declared the public hearing open.
There was no one present wishing to speak during the public hearing.
Council President Christiansen declared the public hearing closed.
Council action on the Electric Fund Budget will take place during the latter part of the meeting.
COUNCIL BUDGET HEARINGS
Members of City Council met in budget hearings on May 21, 1996. The Chairman of the Legislative and Finance Committee, Mr. Salters, explained that the proposed budgets were prepared by the City Manager, Finance Director, and Administrative Services Director with assistance of City staff. The budget totals $73.7 million in expenditures, of which $6.2 million is projected for capital expenditures. The committee recommended acceptance of the proposed 1996/97 budget as presented by staff.
The First Reading of the budget ordinances will take place during the latter part of the meeting.
LEGISLATIVE AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
The Legislative and Finance Committee met on May 28, 1996 with Chairman Salters presiding.
Expansion of City Development Incentive Program - Proposed Ordinance Amendment - Chapter 19.5, Article IV, Abatement of City Real Estate Taxes
Councilman Hare requested that the City Assessor review our current Development Incentive ordinance for new facilities and to provide suggestions on expanding the ordinance to include provisions for qualifying industries and businesses that wish to expand their current business. Mr. Hare noted that Kent County Levy Court has adopted such an ordinance and felt that the City should do likewise. After reviewing the City's current ordinance and the County's ordinance, the City Assessor suggested that the current ordinance be expanded to incorporate the provisions suggested by Mr. Hare.
Mr. Hare explained that although the proposal would result in some lost property tax revenues to the City, he felt that it would ultimately behoove the City and its citizens to encourage business expansion of our current employers. He also felt it only fair to offer the same type of incentives to current businesses as is being offered to new facilities.
The proposal basically provides for the ability of applying for abatement of real estate taxes for anyone investing a minimum of $1 million in a new or existing facility and creates 20 full time jobs of which 75% must be Kent County or Dover residents. The abatement is based on a ten year sliding scale with 90% in the first year and 0% in the tenth year.
Mr. Hare stated that the proposal applies only to those that meet the above requirements of investing $1 million or more in a new facility or investing $1 million or more in expansion of an existing facility. It would not apply to a company that buys an existing facility, unless the new owners invest $1 million or more in expansion of the current facility and the expansion creates the necessary number of new jobs. Eligibility for the tax abatement would be based on the expanded portion only and would not apply to the entire facility. Mr. Hare clarified that the requirements must be met on a per site basis, explaining that one company owning several small facilities cannot combine the resources from all sites in order to qualify.
Mr. Hare suggested that those who qualified during the 1995/96 fiscal year, make application for the abatement prior to July 1, 1996 for this next fiscal year. Council President Christiansen clarified that no one would be eligible for reductions from prior tax years, but that those that are qualified should make application for the reduction for the 1996/97 tax year.
There was general discussion on the requirement for the creation of 20 full time jobs (of which 75% must be Kent County or Dover residents). It was noted that the existing ordinance (for new facilities) requires the creation of 20 full time employees. Mr. Hare asked if Council wished to change the suggestion for 10 full time employees (for current facilities) to 20 which would then coincide with the requirements for new facilities. There was discussion about the current practice of businesses hiring several part time employees versus hiring a lesser number of full time employees as it saves dollars associated with employee benefits. Mrs. Malone felt that we should maintain the requirement of 20 full time employees, reminding Council that it is our desire to create new jobs for our citizens and keeping the number at 20 may encourage a business to reach that goal in order to qualify for the abatement. After further discussion, it was agreed that a compromise to 15 full time employees as a requirement would be agreeable to members of the committee.
Mr. Fenimore suggested that we give consideration to ways of reducing the tax burden on our senior citizens. City Council went on record a few years ago as supporting additional tax reductions to our senior citizens and Mr. Fenimore suggested that this issue be addressed by the Legislative and Finance Committee in the very near future. Mr. Leary agreed that we should be in a constant state of modernizing our rules and regulations and suggested that the committee also review City business licenses to ensure equality among the various categories and to review licenses fees.
The committee recommended approval of the proposed ordinance amendment, stipulating that a minimum of 15 full time employees (of which 75% must be Kent County or Dover residents) be required for compliance in the expanded portion of the ordinance and that application for the tax abatement will be for the 1996/97 tax year with application to be made prior to July 1, 1996.
Utilizing the consent agenda format, Mr. Salters moved for approval of the committee's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Leary and unanimously carried. (The First Reading of the ordinance will take place during the latter part of the meeting.)
Proposed Ordinance Amendment - Section 2-181 - Normal Retirement
It was recently brought to the attention of the Civilian Pension Board that the length of service requirement indicated in Section 2-181 of the Dover Code is not consistent with other sections of the General Employee Pension Plan. The Civilian Pension Board, after consultation with the Deputy City Solicitor, unanimously approved an ordinance amendment for submission to the Legislative and Finance Committee to correct this inconsistency.
Mr. Leary, Chairman of the Civilian Pension Board, explained that this is a housekeeping amendment that changes the length of service requirement from fifteen (15) years to ten (10) years of continuous service for those that have attained the age of 65. Mr. Leary stated that there is no financial impact since the proposal simply brings the language into compliance with other sections of the Code.
The committee recommended approval of the proposed amendment to Section 2-181 of the City Code, as recommended by the Civilian Pension Board.
Utilizing the consent agenda format, Mr. Salters moved for approval of the committee's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Leary and unanimously carried. (The First Reading of the ordinance will take place during the latter part of the meeting.)
Purchase of Optical Imaging and Document Retrieval System
Optical Imaging technology could provide numerous benefits for the City, with access time to find and retrieve paper documents being dramatically reduced. The labor and material costs of making, distributing, and cross filing numerous photocopies can be avoided as well.
The City Clerk's office and Information Services Director have researched such systems thoroughly and recommend the purchase of an optical imaging and document retrieval system. It is planned that implementation of the project will start as a pilot project in the City Clerk's Office. Utilization of this technology will be expanded to other departments starting in the spring of 1997, based on their needs and the success of the pilot.
The City of Dover solicited bids for an imaging system on August 31, 1995. The bids requested hardware, software, and installation support services. One of the key requirements is that the proposed solution be capable of expansion as our needs grow. Sealed bids were received from eight vendors. After review of the bids by the City Clerk's Office and Information Services Director, site visits were performed with five of the vendors and telephone interviews were made with their customers. This resulted in narrowing the field to two vendors whose costs are outlined, as follows:
PMI Collins
Hardware $43,445 $27,986
Software 23,178 11,335
Install/Train 11,250 6,600
Total $77,873 $45,921
Costs for the project were funded in the 1995/96 budgets of the City Clerk's Office and the Information Services Department. However, the expenditure will not take place until after the end of the fiscal year and the funds, therefore, will be carried over in the beginning balance to next fiscal year. These items will be rebudgeted in the first budget revision in the next fiscal year.
It is the recommendation of staff that the City contract with Collins Business Systems, Inc. to implement this Optical Imaging and Document Retrieval System.
The committee recommended that the City enter into a contract with Collins Business Systems, Inc. to purchase and implement the Optical Imaging and Document Retrieval System at a total cost of $45,921, which includes costs for the required hardware, software, installation and training.
Mr. Salters moved for approval of the committee's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
Mr. Salters moved for approval of the Legislative and Finance Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Leary and unanimously carried.
UTILITY COMMITTEE REPORT
The Utility Committee met on June 10, 1996 at 6:20 p.m. with Chairman Lambert presiding. Members present were Councilmen Pitts and Fenimore and Mr. Kramedas and Mr. Carey. In order to facilitate purchases in a timely manner, Mr. O'Connor requested that bid items be approved by Council as soon as possible.
Evaluation of Bids - FY96 Resurfacing Program
In conjunction with the City of Dover's Capital Investments Plan, it is proposed to resurface various streets throughout the City during the fiscal year. There are approximately 40 streets and alleys, in addition to several parking areas which will be resurfaced during the summer of 1996. Funding for the project is available through several sources, including the 1992/93 General Obligation Bonds and the Suburban Street Aid Funds provided by area legislators. Bids were submitted by two contractors and staff recommended that the low bid, in the amount of $767,462.80 by George & Lynch, Inc., be accepted.
Mr. O'Connor expressed appreciation to Senators Still and Bonini and Representatives Wagner and Stone for their commitment of funds to this project.
The committee recommended acceptance of the bid by submitted George & Lynch, Inc. and that the contract for the 1996 Resurfacing Program be awarded to George & Lynch, Inc. in the amount of $767,462.80.
Mr. Lambert moved for approval of the committee's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Fenimore and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Mr. Lambert reiterated the City's appreciation to Senators Still and Bonini and Representatives Wagner and Stone for their commitment of funds to this project.
Bid - One 30-Cubic Yard Automated Side Loading Refuse Collection Body with Chassis
In conjunction with the revised 1996 budget, the Public Works Department has requested permission to purchase a new 30-cubic yard automated side loading refuse body complete with chassis. This new machine will replace vehicle #443 which is a 1988 Peterbilt with a 22-cubic yard automated side loading refuse body. This vehicle has over 285,000 miles and maintenance costs have been excessive over the past few years.
Bid specifications were prepared around the Heil Rapid Rail Automated System since it is the automated system all of our other trucks are equipped with and it is felt that it offers the best packing capabilities for our intended use. Lancer Supply Co., Inc. submitted a bid in the amount of $126,621 and THC Enterprises sent in a no bid package. Since the bid specifications were prepared for continuity of the existing sanitation fleet, the City expected to receive bids from only the Heil Corporation. Due to territorial agreements and a tight delivery schedule, two (2) of the three (3) Heil representative suppliers did not submit bids. In addition, no proposals were received from other equipment vendors.
Mr. O'Connor explained that currently our largest compactor is 22-cubic yards. With the larger compactor, it is hoped that we will decrease our number of runs to the landfill which takes approximately one hour, roundtrip. Since the 30-cubic yard compactor is a very large piece of equipment, it can only be used in certain parts of the City so we will be required to maintain smaller ones as well as well as the new larger capacity units. As we replace our fleet in the future, we will maintain a variation of sizes in order to meet all of our needs.
The committee recommended acceptance of the bid submitted by Lancer Supply Co, Inc. in the amount of $126,621 for the purchase of a 30-cubic yard automated side loading refuse collection body and chassis.
Mr. Lambert moved for approval of the committee's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Pitts and carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
Bid - Electric Stock Materials
Since 1989, the City has purchased electric stock material through a blanket bid process. It has proven to be very cost effective as vendors will guarantee their bid price for materials during the entire fiscal year. Following a thorough evaluation of the bids, staff recommended that purchases be made with the following vendors, for the period July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997, at the estimated costs specified.
ITEMS COMPANY AMOUNT
Amp taps & stirrups, anchors, splices, cable cutters, A.J.P. Sales $1,520,327.49
equipment brackets, pole transformers, padmount
transformers, primary cable, secondary cable, etc.
PVC bushings, cold shrink jackets and terminators, Dixie Supply $ 376,736.50
conduit all sizes, PVC couplings, elbows, equipment
brackets, shot guns, lenses, etc.
Utility bags, rubber blankets, cross arms, bayonet Graybar Elect. $ 65,082.51
fuses, hose line, parachutes, etc.
Amp cartridges & lugs, street light arms, connectors, Hamby Young $ 226,537.33
cutouts fuses links, pedestral, connectors street light
base, etc.
Block & tackle, wood braces ratchet cutters, connectors, Rigby Elect. $ 55,954.44
sand fuses, hoists, etc.
Machine and DA bolts, house meters, pedestals, etc. Rumsey Elect. $ 35,960.28
Cable ties, hacksaws, PVC saws, primary and United $ 27,303.52
secondary cable etc.
Alley braces, armor rod, chain hoists, primary & Wesco $955,621.17
secondary cable etc.
It was noted that the amounts are estimated, based on projected purchases. Other vendors that will be awarded material from the blanket bid, but are under the $25,000 amount brought before Council, include Hesco in the amount of $15,492.62 and Valley Power in the amount of $1,395.08. Mr. O'Connor explained that the above only reflects projected purchases. The cost for a specific item will be maintained but the actual number of purchases could vary and is limited only by the amount of money approved in the budget.
The committee recommended approval of the purchases from the above vendors for the period of July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997.
Mr. Lambert moved for approval of the committee's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Fenimore and carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
Mr. Lambert moved for approval of the Utility Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Hare and unanimously carried. (It is noted that those items from the Utility Committee meeting of June 10, 1996 that were not yet approved by Council will be considered during the meeting of June 24, 1996.)
COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS - FIRE MARSHAL AND DEPUTY FIRE MARSHAL
The Fire Marshal, John Raughley, has chosen to retire. Mr. Hare nominated Mr. David J. Truax to serve as Fire Marshal, effective immediately, seconded by Mr. Truitt. Mr. Leary moved that nominations be closed, seconded by Mr. Hare. The motion was unanimously approved and Mr. David J. Truax was appointed to serve as Fire Marshal.
Mr. Fenimore nominated Mr. Henry R. Baynum, Jr. as Deputy Fire Marshal, effective immediately, seconded by Mr. Salters. Mr. Leary moved that nominations be closed, seconded by Mr. Hare. The motion was unanimously approved and Mr. Henry R. Baynum, Jr. was appointed to serve as Deputy Fire Marshal.
PROPERTY ASSESSMENT APPEALS REPORT
The Assessment Appeals Committee met on May 22, 1996 from 1:30 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. and on June 4, 1996 from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Members present were Mr. Reuben Salters, Chairman, Mr. Pitts and Mr. Leary. Formal property assessments were reviewed and the Committee made the following recommendations:
Capitol Green Housing Corp.
Value Appealed
Property Owner/Address Appealed Appraised Assessed
Capitol Green Housing Corp. $4,100,400 $2,460,200
Properties - Capitol Green
The Committee recommended denial of the assessment appeal.
Mr. Salters reported that the Capitol Green Housing Corporation has withdrawn their assessment appeal. Council took no further action on the appeal.
General Foods Corp.
Value Appealed
Property Owner/Address Appealed Appraised Assessed
1250 W. North Street $35,273,400 $21,164,000
The Committee tabled action until a future date.
Mr. Salters moved that the property assessment appeal of General Foods Corp. be tabled, seconded by Mr. Leary and unanimously carried.
Downtown Dover Development Corp.
Value Appealed
Property Owner/Address Appealed Appraised Assessed
5 E. Reed Street $1,538,900 $923,300
The Committee recommended that 37.92% be exempted, with $955,400 appraised and $573,200 assessed.
Council President Christiansen declared the hearing open.
There was no one present wishing to speak during the public hearing.
Council President Christiansen declared the hearing closed.
Mr. Salters moved for approval of the committee's recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Malone and unanimously carried.
Mr. Hare requested that the Legislative and Finance Committee consider the concept of an automatic exemption for that portion of the Reed Street building being rented by the City of Dover. This would eliminate the need for review every year by the Assessment Appeals Committee.
Mr. Salters moved for acceptance of the Property Assessment Appeals Report, seconded by Mr. Leary and unanimously carried.
SETTING OF PROPERTY TAX RATE
The tax rate for the 1995/96 property tax billing was sixty eight and one half cents ($.685) per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation. The proposed budget maintains the same rate for the upcoming tax billing.
Mr. Truitt moved that the property tax rate remain at sixty eight and one half cents ($.685) per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation for the upcoming 1996/97 property tax billing. The motion was seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
DOWNTOWN DOVER BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BUDGET/ASSESSMENT RATE FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996/97
The Business Improvement District (BID) ordinance adopted by the City Council last year requires that the Council adopt a BID budget and assessment every year. A report was submitted by Mr. Mike Karia and Mr. Tony DePrima for City Council consideration and approval.
Mr. DePrima explained the assessment rate as follows:
|
|
ZONE 1 |
ZONE 2 |
ZONE 3 |
TOTAL |
|
ASSESSMENT TAX RATE PER $100 ASSESSMENT |
0.145 |
0.1025 |
0.035 |
--- |
|
REVENUE RAISED |
$20,265 |
$15,920 |
$3,983 |
$40,168 |
|
% REVENUE RAISED |
50% |
40% |
10% |
|
|
NUMBER OF PARCELS |
136 |
129 |
58 |
323 |
|
AVERAGE ASSESSMENT |
$151 |
$115 |
$135 |
$134 |
Mr. Fenimore stated that he feels that we should continue with BID for at least another year to determine its success. He commended Main Street and Mr. DePrima for their hard work on this project.
Mr. Fenimore moved to approve the above Downtown Dover Business Improvement District assessment rate for fiscal year 1996/97. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Malone and carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
FIRST READING - PROPOSED BUDGET ORDINANCES
Mr. Hare moved to waive the reading of the proposed budget ordinances before Council, seconded by Mrs. Malone and unanimously carried. Council President Christiansen reminded the public that copies of the proposed ordinances are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers or can be obtained from the City Clerk's Office. Final action by Council on the proposed ordinances will take place during the Council Meeting of June 24, 1996.
Mr. Hare moved for acknowledgement of the first reading of the following proposed budget ordinances, by title only, seconded by Mrs. Malone and unanimously carried:
Budget Ordinances - Revised 1995/96 - Proposed 1996/97
A. General Fund - Cash Receipts and Expenses
B. Contingency Fund - Cash Receipts and Expenses
C. Water/Wastewater Fund - Revenue and Expenses
D. Water/Wastewater Contingency Fund - Cash Receipts and Expenses
E. Water Improvement/Extension Fund - Cash Receipts and Expenses
F. Wastewater Improvement/Extension Fund - Cash Receipts and Expenses
G. Electric Revenue Fund - Revenue and Expenses
H. Electric Revenue Fund - Energy Related Items, Cash Receipts and Expenses
I. Electric Utility Improvement and Extension Fund - Cash Receipts and Expenses
J. Electric Utility Depreciation Reserve - Source and Use of Funds
K. Electric Utility Insurance Stabilization Fund - Source and Use of Funds
L. Electric Utility Future Capacity Fund - Source and Use of Funds
M. Intergovernmental Service Fund - Cash Receipts and Expenses
N. Municipal Street Aid Fund - Cash Receipts and Expenses
O. Police Grant Fund - Cash Receipts and Expenses
P. Library Grants Fund - Cash Receipts and Expenses
Q. Library Endowment Fund - Cash Receipts and Expenses
R. Community Development Fund - Cash Receipts and Expenses
S. Delaware Community Clusters Against Substance Abuse Project - Cash Receipts and Expenses
T. Health Insurance Fund - Cash Receipts and Expenses