REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
The Regular Council Meeting was held on June 23, 1997 at 7:30 p.m. with Council President Christiansen presiding. Council members present were Mr. Lambert, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Leary, Mr. Truitt, Mrs. Malone, Mr. Salters and Mr. Weller. Mr. Fenimore was absent.
Council staff members present were Chief Faulkner, Mr. Lucas, Mr. O'Connor, Mr. DePrima, Chief Carey, Mrs. Boaman and Mr. Rodriguez.
OPEN FORUM
The Open Forum was held at 7:15 p.m., prior to commencement of the Official Council Meeting. Council President Christiansen declared the open forum in session and reminded those present that Council is not in official session and cannot take formal action.
There was no one present wishing to speak during the Open Forum.
The invocation was given by Elder Wallace Dixon, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
Council President Christiansen requested the deletion of agenda item #2 (Presentation - Dover High School Gold Team), noting that the presentation will be rescheduled for the next Council Meeting. Mr. Salters requested the addition of the following agenda items:
#2 - Proclamation - African American Festival
#4B - Basic Life Support Service Contract
#8A - Council & Managerial Employees - Salary Adjustments
Mrs. Malone moved for approval of the agenda as amended, seconded by Mr. Weller and unanimously carried.
REMARKS BY MRS. CHRISTINE FENIMORE RELATIVE TO ILLNESS OF COUNCILMAN PHILIP FENIMORE
Mr. Leary requested permission for Mrs. Christine Fenimore to address City Council. There were no objections from members of Council.
Mrs. Fenimore offered the following remarks:
“I would like to thank Council for allowing me to speak this evening. My husband has asked me
to make these remarks in his absence. Phil was recently diagnosed with cancer, an aggressive form of lymphoma, and is in the treatment process. He is still at Christiana Hospital, but God willing, should be home soon. If you would like to send him a card, he is in room #6135, but no telephone calls or visits, please. It is his current opinion that he can continue to serve as your City Councillor while receiving further treatment. He hopes that you agree. Council President and members of Council have endorsed Phil’s opinion and reduced his committee assignments. Although he will not be attending meetings for the near future, he is aware, in touch, and involved with City activities. In fact, one of the biggest on-going issues that should concern everyone is DelDOT’s decision regarding locating major facilities at the old Train Station. What DelDOT is proposing is insufficient. All concerned should be contacting their elected officials at all levels that it is Dover’s turn to receive some state revitalization and commitment of resources. In closing, Phil and I would like to thank all who have shown their support in our time of need. Your prayers, your expressions of concern and offers of assistance are greatly appreciated. Phil looks forward to returning to Council floor as quickly as possible.”
ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 9, 1997
The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of June 9, 1997 were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Salters, seconded by Mrs. Malone and bore the written approval of Mayor Hutchison.
PROCLAMATION - AFRICAN AMERICAN HERITAGE DAY
The City Clerk read into the record the following Proclamation:
WHEREAS, when President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation that all slaves would be free as of January 1863, the intent was the abolishment of slavery throughout the country for several million bondsmen; and
WHEREAS, it was June 19, 1865 before many of the Southern States got the message that slavery had been abolished, and notably, Texas and Louisiana began a yearlong celebration upon hearing the “good news”; and
WHEREAS, in celebration of this event in the evolution of the American culture, the Inner City Cultural League, Inc., with the support of City Government, the Delaware Division of the Arts, businesses, religious organizations, and individual citizens, presents the Seventh African American Heritage Festival, “Positively Dover”; and
WHEREAS, the African American is very proud of his cultural heritage and has contributed greatly to the development of the great American culture; and
WHEREAS, Freedom From Slavery Month is traditionally celebrated during the month of June; and
WHEREAS, all of the citizens of the State of Delaware, and especially the citizens of the City of Dover and the surrounding communities, will celebrate “Positively Dover” African American Heritage Day on Saturday, June 28, 1997 on Legislative Mall, Capital Complex, Downtown Dover from 10:00 a.m. until 8:00 p.m.; and
WHEREAS, this is a family program, suitable for youth and adults and the entire population is invited to observe this historical occasion with the African American Community.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, JAMES L. HUTCHISON, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DOVER, do hereby proclaim June 28, 1997 as AFRICAN AMERICAN HERITAGE DAY in the City of Dover and urge all citizen to join in the celebration of this day.
The Proclamation was presented to Councilman Reuben Salters. Mr. Salters expressed appreciation for the Proclamation and urged everyone to join in the activities on June 28th.
PROCLAMATION - USO DELAWARE MONTH
The City Clerk read into the record the following Proclamation:
WHEREAS, USO Delaware, Inc. endeavors to enhance the quality of life for military personnel and their families, both residing in and transiting through our local community; and
WHEREAS, USO Delaware, Inc. is the channel through which the Dover community may support the unique needs of our modern military; and
WHEREAS, USO Delaware, Inc. serves to foster integration and interaction within the local military and civilian communities through the development and implementation of support services and programs; and
WHEREAS, USO Delaware, Inc. is supportive of and interacts with state and city governments and their agencies, as well as other community oriented organizations; and
WHEREAS, USO Delaware, Inc. was founded on 50 years of patriotic service to the military members of the United States of America through our World Headquarters and its Councils.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, JAMES L. HUTCHISON, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DOVER, do hereby proclaim July 1 - 31, 1997 as USO DELAWARE MONTH in the City of Dover and urge all citizens to recognize the importance of this observance.
The Proclamation was presented to Ms. Joan Cote, USO Director, Col. (Ret.) Gene Hebert, Vice-President of the USO Board, and Ms. Peg Weis, Fund Raising Chair. On behalf of Mayor Hutchison, Council President Christiansen presented the USO with two City of Dover polo shirts as donations for gifts for the USO Golf Tournament.
Ms. Cote also relayed that Council President Christiansen was one of the original founding members of the USO in Delaware and that Councilman Reuben Salters is a USO Board member.
Col. Hebert expressed appreciation for the donation, for the issuance of the Proclamation and for the public support of the efforts of USO. He also offered best wishes for a speedy recovery from the Board to Councilman Fenimore and congratulations to Keith Faulkner, the newly appointed Chief of Police.
Chief Faulkner thanked Col. Hebert and took this opportunity to introduce the new Deputy Chief, Captain Robert Hirt.
Legislative and Finance Committee Report
The Legislative and Finance Committee met on June 9, 1997 with Chairman Salters presiding.
Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Senior Citizen Housing Zone
Through the development of The Dover Plan, the lack of zoning provisions which address senior citizen housing options was identified as an element which needs to be addressed. The Comprehensive Plan Implementation chapter recommends the development of such provisions. The proposed amendment is intended to address this issue. The proposed amendment would permit various senior citizen housing opportunities as Conditional Uses requiring City Council review and Planning Commission approval as part of the Planned Neighborhood Design Option.
Under this amendment, senior citizen housing proposals may be considered in all zones except the C-4, M and IPM zoning districts. Prior to submission to the Planning Commission, such proposals are first reviewed by City Council in conceptual form or determination as to whether or not the proposal warrants further review and consideration by the Planning Commission.
This amendment sets forth general design parameters and performance standards, and stipulates a minimum age requirement of 55 years for heads of households within such projects. The Planned Neighborhood Design Option currently is limited to projects which involve land subdivision. In recognition of the probability that some, if not most, senior housing proposals will not involve subdivision of land, the amendment outlines the process for such projects.
The committee recommended approval of the proposed amendment and that a public hearing be held on June 23, 1997 to consider adoption of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinances for the Senior Housing Zone Option.
Mr. Salters moved for approval of the committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Malone and unanimously carried.
Basic Life Support Contract
The City has contracted with a private vendor to provide Basic Life Support service in the Robbins Hose Fire District since August 31, 1991. Ambulance Service, Inc. (ASI) our current provider, began providing basic life support service on March 4, 1996 when Metro Ambulance Service, Inc. declared bankruptcy. ASI is both incorporated and headquartered in Delaware and all of their ambulances are centrally dispatched from the headquarters at 738 S. Governors Avenue.
ASI's performance and service to the community since taking control in 1996 has been outstanding. ASI provides service to the public which exceeds the contract requirements by providing a second 911 unit during peak periods. Since March 1996, this second unit responded to 286 calls in addition to the 3,099 calls to which the dedicated 911 unit responded. In addition, ASI assisted surrounding volunteer ambulance companies by responding to 256 calls outside the Robbins Hose Fire District when requested by the Kent County Dispatch Center. They also provide an outreach program, visiting the local elementary schools and speaking to the children as well as making the ambulance available for the children to go through.
Due to their outstanding performance record, commitment to customer service, local ownership, services offered beyond the scope of the contract and working relationship with the City, the committee recommended that Council renew the existing Basic Life Support service contract for the Robbins Hose Fire District with ASI for the period of September 1, 1997 through August 31, 2000.
Mr. Salters moved to approve the committee’s recommendation for renewal of the existing Basic Life Support service contract for the Robbins Hose Fire District with ASI for the period of September 1, 1997 through August 31, 2000. The motion was seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Fenimore absent).
Mr. Salters moved for acceptance of the Legislative and Finance Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Leary and unanimously carried.
PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING ZONE
A public hearing was duly advertised for this time and place to consider approval of a proposed zoning ordinance amendment that would permit various senior citizen housing opportunities as Conditional Uses requiring City Council review and Planning Commission approval as part of the Planned Neighborhood Design Option.
Council President Christiansen declared the public hearing open.
There was no one present wishing to speak during the public hearing.
Council President Christiansen declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. Salters moved that action on this matter be considered during discussions on item #9a, seconded by Mrs. Malone and unanimously carried. (The First Reading of the ordinance will take place during the latter part of the meeting.)
UTILITY COMMITTEE REPORT
The Utility Committee met on June 9, 1997 with Chairman Lambert presiding.
Bid - Electric Stock Material
The City purchases electric stock material through a blanket bid process. This method has proven to be very cost effective as vendors will guarantee their bid price for materials during the entire fiscal year. It was noted that 673 individual items were bid. Due to the complexity of the bid, bid summaries were not provided to each member, but was available for discussion purposes. When reviewing the individual bids, City staff considered low bid as well as local vendor preference. Following a thorough evaluation of bids, staff recommended that purchases be made with the following vendors, for the period July 1, 1997 through June 30, 1998:
Dixie Electric Supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192,886.43
Graybar Electric. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,865.94
Hamby Young. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4,611.00
Hesco. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69,872.38
National Transformer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .76,976.00
Rumsey Electric . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .60,415.51
Tecot Electric. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,103.28
United Electric. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,056.42
Vanyo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .906,214.40
Wesco. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,472,322.00
Mr. O’Connor reminded members that the amounts are estimated, based on projected purchases and that the City is not obligated to purchase materials for the total bidded price.
The committee recommended approval of the purchases from the above vendors for the period of July 1, 1997 through June 30, 1998.
Mr. Lambert moved for approval of the committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Fenimore absent).
Street Waiver Request - John Hunn Brown Property
Subdivision Regulations, Appendix A of the City Code, Article VI, Section A, specify a street pavement width of 38' within a 60' right-of-way with no variation given for whether on-street parking is controlled. A petition to waive certain subdivision street design standards has been received for the John Hunn Brown subdivision. The street waiver requests are summarized as follows:
1) Proposed Collector Streets: 60' Right-of-Way, 30' street pavement when no parking allowed on street, 38' when parking is allowed on one side of the street.
2) Proposed Access Streets: 50' Right-of-Way, 24' street pavement when no parking is allowed, 32' when parking is allowed on one side of the street.
Waivers are also sought to permit a tighter centerline radius than permitted at the following locations:
1) The proposed traffic circle calls for a 115'+/- centerline radius on the collector street, code calls for a minimum 300' radius on collector streets.
2) One proposed expanded cul-de-sac street calls for a 90' centerline radius, the code calls for a 150' radius.
Mr. DePrima explained that the staff worked carefully with the developer to design a street system that is creative and serves the City’s need for streets that are safe, that promote efficient travel ways for public and emergency service vehicles, and enhance the appearance of the neighborhood.
The street system proposes looping residential access streets of varying lengths linked to a main collector street that runs from South Little Creek Road to North Little Creek Road. A defining feature of the collector street is a proposed round-about (circle) which is intended to create a distinctive visual attribute while serving as a discouragement to high-speed through traffic. Other unique features are: rear access alleys mostly in association with townhouse blocks with five or more units; smaller townhouse blocks will have an expanded cul-de-sac design to provide for overflow and guest parking; only one true cul-de-sac street is proposed within a single family portion of the site; three (3) common boat and recreation vehicle parking areas.
The developer is proposing reduced street widths of varying sizes throughout the subdivision. The varying widths are a function of on-street parking. The developer is seeking to control on-street parking for reasons of safety and attractiveness by having designated areas for parallel parking. Where designated areas exist, the parking width increases by 8'. Where it does not exist, the extra area will be dedicated to the landscaped area between the road and sidewalk.
The Planning staff and the Planning Commission support the reduced street waivers for the following reasons:
1. The reduced street widths are a part of the overall design which relegates parking to controlled areas including: designated on-street areas, rear parking areas of alleys, parking islands, front driveways and garages, and long term storage areas. In addition, the alleys will have the effect of drawing traffic away from the streets.
2. Reduced street widths will create increased “green ways” along the street which will improve the look of the development and reduce stormwater discharge.
3. The City’s cost of maintaining the streets will be less in the long term.
4. Narrower streets have the effect of slowing traffic and are easier to cross for pedestrians.
5. There are a number of established and successful developments in Dover which have similar streets widths, with a number of developments having even less street widths than what is being proposed.
The staff and Planning Commission also support the reduced radius for the collector street circle and expanded cul-de-sac because they are a part of the overall unique design. Both have been determined to be safe by the City Engineer.
Mr. DePrima stated that our current street standards need to be updated and they are currently working with the MPO and DelDOT on revising street standards state-wide. He stated his feeling that our street width requirements may be excessive. Mr. DePrima also explained that with the regulation of parking, there would actually be more travel area on the streets than if our standards of 38' were adhered to with no restricted parking.
Mr. Lambert encouraged possible revisions to the City’s street standards, stating his opinion that 38' streets are very wide and often encourages speeding.
During the committee meeting, Mr. Ted Williams of Landmark Engineering gave an overview of how the development would look with the requested waivers. He explained that they plan designated areas for boat and recreation vehicle parking so that the development remains aesthetically pleasing. Guest parking areas will also be provided to eliminate the need for vehicles to be parked along the street. They are required to provide a minimum of 2.75 parking stalls per unit, but intend to provide something in excess of the requirement. At the current time, it is estimated at approximately 2.8 to 2.9 parking stalls, with the final determination to be made as the plans are finalized.
Mr. DePrima stated that boat and recreation vehicle parking areas would be advantageous for enforcement purposes. During the summer months, the Inspectors respond to many complaints of boats being improperly parked in residential developments.
The committee recommended approval of the requested waivers, as recommended by City staff and the Planning Commission.
Mr. Lambert moved for approval of the committee’s recommendation. The motion was seconded by Mr. Leary for purposes of discussion.
Mr. Lambert stated that Mr. DePrima has prepared additional information on this subject and requested that he explain the handout that was distributed to members of Council. Since several members of Council expressed concern that the .75 minimum on-street parking per dwelling unit that is proposed by the developer may not be adequate, the Planning staff conducted an on-street parking survey for similar streets. The survey (as on file with the City Clerk) was taken between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. on June 19, 1997. The streets and/or developments selected were chosen due to their similarity in density, style and makeup to the John Hunn Tract. There were a total of 486 dwelling units, with 175 vehicles parked on the street, resulting in a ratio of cars to dwelling units of .36, which is approximately half of the average proposed by the John Hunn Brown developer.
Asked by Mr. Leary where the .75 cars per dwelling unit standard emanates from, Mr. DePrima stated that it is simply a proposal of the developer and is not a City standard. He explained that a townhome owner in the John Hunn Brown development would be entitled to two vehicle spaces in their driveway and any additional vehicles would have to park in the designated on-street parking areas. Mr. DePrima also reminded Council that many of the homes have rear alleys.
Mr. Leary referred to a letter that was received from Rexene Ornauer, Planning Commission member, that pointed out the following motion adopted by the Planning Commission:
“Mrs. Ornauer moved to approve the concept plan and reserved the Planning Commission’s right with regard to the parking spaces/bump outs if there is a need to add bumpouts when better defined drawings are submitted at the preliminary approval stage. She also added that should, in the future, the neighborhood desire an increase of on-street parking, it would be at the expense of the neighborhood association and not at the expense of the City of Dover and that this should be noted on the ordinary plan. Also, a minimum of .75 parking spaces per dwelling unit on-street is required. Mr. Holt seconded, and the motion was carried unanimously.”
Mr. Salters voiced objection to placing a financial burden on future homeowners in the event it is determined that additional on-street parking is required. To that extent, Mr. Weller asked Mr. Rodriquez if the City could legally require a homeowner to bear the costs for providing additional parking if it is later determined that it is needed. Mr. Rodriguez stated his opinion that it would be difficult to require the homeowner to pay for additional parking if the City of Dover approved exceptions to the requirement.
Noting that completion of the entire development could take up to 10 years, Mr. Truitt asked if the developer can change the plans during the construction period. Mr. DePrima stated that a developer may request consideration of plan changes at any time.
Mr. Lambert moved to suspend the rules to allow the developer to address questions that have been raised on this issue. The motion was seconded by Mr. Leary and unanimously carried.
Mr. Bob Burns stated that it seems that some members of Council are concerned that the overflow parking will be insufficient. After discussions with his engineer and architect, they feel that the parking can be increased from .75 to one space per dwelling unit. He also reminded Council that the development is not concentrated with townhomes, but is a mixed unit development. In addition, alleys are provided in many areas of the development which will lighten the parking needs.
Mr. Lambert reminded Council that wide streets encourage speeding, whereas narrow streets tend to reduce speed. Also, on streets where parking is prohibited, there is no risk of children running into the street from behind parked vehicles. Therefore, in addition to the lower maintenance costs and more grass areas, narrower streets provide increased safety for vehicles and pedestrians.
Mr. Salters called for the question on the motion to approve the requested street waivers.
Referring to his original motion, Mr. Lambert modified the motion to approve the requested street waivers, stipulating that a minimum of one on-street parking space and two off-street parking spaces be provided, for a total of three parking spaces, per dwelling unit. On a roll call vote of four (4) yes (Mr. Lambert, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Leary and Mr. Salters), and four (4) no (Mr. Truitt, Mrs. Malone, Mr. Weller and Council President Christiansen), the motion failed.
Mr. Truitt stated that many citizens have expressed concern with approval of the requested waivers. He stated his opinion that there may be a misunderstanding of narrow streets and suggested that more information be provided to the public. Mr. DePrima requested that all citizens with questions on any development or construction proposals come to his office to review the plans and seek answers to their questions.
Mr. Lambert moved for acceptance of the Utility Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Leary and unanimously carried.
MONTHLY REPORTS - MAY
By motion of Mr. Leary, seconded by Mr. Salters, the following monthly reports were accepted by consent:
Planning and Inspections Report
City Assessor Report
City Clerk/Alderman Report (Fines)
Mayor's Report
General Fund, Cash Receipts & Budget Report
Water/Sewer Fund, Revenue & Budget Report
Electric Revenue Fund, Revenue & Budget Report
Improvement and Extension Fund, Cash Receipts & Budget Report
Internal Service Fund, Revenue & Budget Report
Referring to the Chief of Police Report, Mr. Salters felt that more detailed information would be beneficial. He stated that he will meet with Chief Faulkner to discuss this in greater detail. Mrs. Malone reminded Chief Faulkner that with warmer weather upon us, the problem of noise emitting from vehicles will increase. She requested that the Police Department pay greater attention to this problem as it is a concern of many of our citizens.
Referring to the City Manager’s Report, Mr. Leary referred to information on the Facilities Management Division. He requested that the City Manager highlight some of the events taking place in this division. Mr. O’Connor stated that many of our City parks are being spruced up at the suggestion of our Parks and Recreation Sub-committee. Pavilions are being built and signs designating City parks are being installed. Many improvements are being made to our existing recreational areas. The City hired two temporary employees for the summer to assist with this project.
Mr. Leary moved for approval of the City Manager’s Report and the Chief of Police Report, seconded by Mr. Salters and unanimously carried.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
IBEW Agreement
The City Manager explained that the IBEW contract has been voted upon by its members and is recommended for approval. The contract is a 10 year agreement on wages with contract re-openers at the 3rd, 6th and 9th year. It calls for a 3% increase through the tenth year, with negotiations to take place on non-salary issues. It also contains a ½% set-off per year for the purpose of retiree health care for employees hired after 7/1/86. It also contains modifications to the City’s holiday schedule and sick leave policy.
Mr. Lambert stated his opinion that the proposal is a good contract that is fair to both sides.
Mr. Lambert moved for approval of the IBEW employment agreement (as on file with the Office of the City Clerk). The motion was seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Fenimore absent).
Council Employees and Managerial Salary Adjustments
Noting that managerial employees are not a part of a bargaining unit and are not covered under the three bargaining units, Mr. Salters moved that the City Manager be authorized to distribute salary increases to managerial employees under his charge, based upon individual evaluation, in an amount up to 3% of personnel costs for the compensation package, effective July 1, 1997, and that the City Clerk, Assistant City Clerk, City Planner and City Assessor receive a 3% salary adjustment, effective July 1, 1997. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lambert and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Fenimore absent).
FIRST READING - PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
Mr. Leary moved to waive the reading of the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment before Council, seconded by Mr. Weller and unanimously carried. Council President Christiansen reminded the public that copies of the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendments are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers or can be obtained from the City Clerk's Office. Final action by Council on the proposed ordinance amendments will take place during the Council Meeting of July 14, 1997.
Mr. Leary moved for acknowledgment of the first reading of the following proposed ordinance, by title only, seconded by Mr. Weller and unanimously carried:
∙ PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING ZONE
FINAL READING - PROPOSED BUDGET ORDINANCES
The First Reading of the following proposed ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of June 9, 1997.
Mr. Salters moved that the final reading of the proposed budget ordinances be acknowledged by title only, seconded by Mrs. Malone and unanimously carried.
Mr. Salters moved for adoption of the following budget ordinances, seconded by Mrs. Malone and carried by a unanimous roll call vote:
1997/98 BUDGET ORDINANCES
GENERAL FUND
CASH RECEIPTS AND BUDGET FOR 1997/98
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET:
1. The amount hereinafter named aggregating Fifteen Million Three Hundred Eighty-Five Thousand Three Hundred Eighty-Nine Dollars ($15,385,389) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by the several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1997, and ending June 30, 1998:
Cash Receipt Estimates
1996/97 1997/98
Revised Budget
Items
Prior Year Balance $ 1,430,011 $ 1,203,878
Fines and Police Revenue 412,000 412,000
Franchise Fees 401,230 251,000
911 Fee 0 240,000
Interest Trans & Earnings 290,000 290,000
Library Revenues 45,737 49,644
Kent County Book Reimbursement 170,625 170,625
Business Licenses 850,000 850,000
Permits and Other Licenses 337,300 325,000
Miscellaneous Charges 45,000 45,000
Police Extra Duty 197,000 180,000
Property Taxes 5,540,000 5,544,371
Recreation Revenue