REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
The Regular Council Meeting was held on November 27, 2000 at 7:30 p.m. with Council President Christiansen presiding. Council members present were Mr. McGlumphy, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Truitt, Mr. Carey, Mrs. Malone, Mr. Salters, and Mr. Weller. Mr. Gorman was absent.
Council staff members present were Chief Faulkner, Mr. Cooper, Mr. O'Connor, Mr. DePrima, Mrs. Mitchell, Mrs. Green, and Deputy City Solicitor Pepper.
OPEN FORUM
The Open Forum was held at 7:15 p.m., prior to commencement of the Official Council Meeting. Council President Christiansen declared the Open Forum in session and reminded those present that Council is not in official session and cannot take formal action.
There was no one present wishing to speak during the Open Forum.
The invocation was given by Chaplain Wallace Dixon, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
Mrs. Malone requested the addition of item #4A - Remarks. Mr. Salters requested the addition of item #5D - Purchase of Command Post Vehicle and Special Operations Response Team Van.
Mrs. Malone moved for approval of the agenda as amended, seconded by Mr. Weller and unanimously carried.
ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2000
The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of November 13, 2000 were unanimously approved, with Mr. Carey not voting due to his absence, by motion of Mrs. Malone, seconded by Mr. Truitt and bore the written approval of Mayor Hutchison.
PRESENTATION - MICHAEL K. CHAPMAN - SERVICE ON DOVER RECREATIONAL FACILITIES COMMITTEE
Council President Christiansen, along with Councilwoman Malone (Chairwoman of the Parks and Recreation Committee), and General Vetter (Representing the Dover Recreational Facilities Committee), presented Mr. Michael K. Chapman with a Dover Cup in recognition of service rendered on behalf of the City. Mr. Chapman served as a member of the Dover Recreational Facilities Committee from August 1996 through October 2000. On behalf of all members of Council, Council President Christiansen relayed appreciation for the contribution and assistance provided by Mr. Chapman and wished him much success in future endeavors.
Mr. Chapman expressed his appreciation for the recognition and thanked members of Council for allowing him the opportunity to serve.
PROPOSED REFERENDUM RESOLUTION - DOVER REGIONAL COMMUNITY SPORTS AND RECREATION CENTER
During their Regular Meeting of August 28, 2000, Council authorized a $3M referendum to be scheduled for Saturday, February 3, 2001. Members were provided with a proposed Resolution, as prepared by Bond Counsel, that authorizes Council to hold a referendum election for the issuance of up to $3M General Obligation Bonds.
Mrs. Malone moved for adoption of the following Resolution, seconded by Mr. McGlumphy and carried by a roll call vote of seven (7) yes, one (1) no (Mr. Weller), and one (1) absent (Mr. Gorman):
RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE HOLDING OF A REFERENDUM ELECTION
AS TO THE ISSUANCE OF UP TO
$3,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF THE
CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE
TO FINANCE A PORTION OF THE COSTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
COMMUNITY SPORTS AND RECREATION CENTER AND COSTS ASSOCIATED
THEREWITH
WHEREAS, the Mayor and the Council (the “Council”) of the City of Dover, Delaware (the “City”) have determined that there is a need in the City for a sports and recreation facility, meeting rooms, a branch library and offices for the City of Dover Parks and Recreation Department as described in Exhibit A (the “Project”);
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council are authorized by Section 50, Chapter 143, Volume 64 of the Laws of Delaware, as amended (the “City Charter”), subject to approval of the qualified voters of the City as hereinafter provided, to borrow money and to give evidence of debts so incurred by the issuance of bonds of the City secured by the full faith and credit of the City, for such purposes as may be deemed necessary and proper by the Mayor and Council for the management and maintenance of the City;
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council have determined the advisability of funding a portion of the costs of the Project with the proceeds from the sale of general obligation bonds of the City (“Bonds”), subject to approval by the qualified voters of the City at a referendum election as hereinafter provided;
WHEREAS, the balance of the cost of the Project will be funded from State and Kent County grants, private contributions and other funds to be appropriated by the City;
WHEREAS, the Mayor and the Council desire to borrow, pursuant to and in accordance with Section 50 of the City Charter, a sum of up to $3,000,000, said debt to be evidenced by the issuance of Bonds secured by the full faith and credit of the City in order to finance a portion of the costs of the Project;
WHEREAS, Section 50 (b) of the City Charter provides that the amount of the aggregate indebtedness of the City, secured by the full faith and credit of the City, shall not at any time exceed a sum equal to 25% of the total assessed valuation of all real property situate within the bounds of the City;
WHEREAS, the addition of $3,000,000 to the aggregate indebtedness of the City, secured by the full faith and credit of the City, will not cause the limitations of Section 50 (b) of the City Charter to be exceeded.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the City as follows:
(1) The Project would enhance the health, safety, convenience and comfort of the citizens of the City;
(2) Subject to approval of the qualified voters of the City as hereinafter
provided:
(a)the City shall borrow up to $3,000,000 for the costs of the Project, such costs to include all costs associated with the Project including, but not limited to, all initial planning expenses, all legal, accounting, and financing fees and the like associated with the Project and the borrowing therefor and the costs of the issuance and sale of the Bonds issued in connection therewith, and
(b)as required by the provisions of Section 50 of the City Charter:
(i)the aforesaid debt shall be evidenced by the issuance of Bonds, secured by the full faith and credit of the City, in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $3,000,000 (without regard to original issue discount);
(ii)the aforesaid Bonds shall be issued in one or more series, shall bear such date or dates, shall mature at such time or times, shall bear interest at such rate or rates, shall be payable at such time or times, and at such place or places, shall be in such denominations, and shall contain such other provisions as the Mayor and Council may provide and shall be set forth in the said Bonds. Such Bonds may or may not be coupon bonds and may be registered or otherwise as the Mayor and Council deem advisable;
(iii)the Mayor and Council shall direct and effect the preparation and sale of said Bonds at such time or times, at such price or prices, and upon such terms as the Mayor and Council shall deem advisable and all monies arising from the sale of said bonds shall be used for the municipal purposes of the City as set forth in this resolution;
(iv)the form of said Bonds shall be as prescribed by the Mayor and Council, and all such Bonds shall be signed by the Mayor and the Treasurer of the City and sealed with the corporate seal thereof. Facsimile signatures of the Mayor and the Treasurer and a facsimile of the corporate seal may be imprinted upon such Bonds in lieu of the signatures of the said Mayor and Treasurer in their own handwriting and of the affixing of the corporate seal itself.
(v)the Mayor and Council shall levy and raise by taxation in each and every year such sums of money as may be required to pay the interest accrued on said Bonds while all or any of said Bonds remain unpaid, and the Mayor and Council shall levy and raise by taxation, from time to time, such sum or sums of money as may be needed to establish such sinking fund as the Mayor and Council may authorize in their discretion for the redemption of said Bonds, or any of them, at or before their maturity and such sum or sums of money as may be required to otherwise redeem any or all of said Bonds at or before their maturity; taxes for interest and for redemption of said Bonds shall be levied and raised as taxes for general municipal purposes in the City are levied and raised, and shall be in addition to those levied and raised for any and all other municipal purposes.
(3)In the event that there are any excess proceeds of the Bonds remaining after the completion of the Project to the extent determined by the Mayor and Council, any such funds may be applied, subject to the limitations of Section 50 of the City Charter, as determined by the Mayor and Council or to the prepayment of the Bonds.
(4)The aforesaid resolution to incur general obligation bonded indebtedness shall be placed before the qualified voters of the City for approval or disapproval at a Referendum Election to be held on February 3, 2001, the polls to be open from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. at the following location: Elks Club, 1035 Forest Avenue, Dover, Delaware.
(5)The City Treasurer shall maintain information describing the Project and shall make such information available for public inspection.
(6)As provided in Section 50(d) of the City Charter, as modified by federal and state law and judicial interpretation thereof, voting at the Referendum Election shall be conducted as follows:
(a) Qualified voters shall be every natural person who is a resident or a nonresident taxable of the City, of the age of eighteen (18) years or upwards. A nonresident taxable shall be such natural person who is listed as taxable according to the last City assessment and tax payment record preceding the referendum election.
(b)Each qualified voter shall be eligible to vote and shall have one (1) vote.
(c) Voting by absentee ballot shall be permitted in accordance with Section 8 of the City Charter.
(d) Votes shall be cast either “For Bond Issue” or “Against Bond Issue” for the Project and Voting shall be conducted by voting machines; voting by proxy shall not be permitted.
(e) The Mayor and Council shall appoint one judge and two (2) clerks to pass upon the qualifications of each voter and to conduct the election and a majority of the election officers present at the opening of the polls, shall fill any vacancy among the election officers. A majority of the election officers shall be sufficient to decide the qualifications of the voters.
(f) The Mayor and Council hereby appoint the City Manager or other City employee (designated by the City Manager) familiar with the City assessment and tax payment records to attend the election with the last City assessment and tax payment records for the inspection of the elections officers.
(g) The Election clerks shall each keep a separate tally sheet and their tally sheets shall be compared and must agree as to the total votes cast for and the total votes cast against the bond issue and both tally sheets shall be certified as correct by at least two (2) of the Election officers and delivered to the Mayor or clerk of Council immediately after the tally sheets have been compared, are in agreement and are certified.
(h) The Judge of the election shall, in the case of a tie vote on the bond issue cast the deciding vote, otherwise he shall refrain from voting, but the election clerks, if otherwise qualified, may vote.
(7) Notice of the holding of the Referendum Election shall be published once a week for three (3) consecutive weeks in The Delaware State News, which is a newspaper circulated in the City, prior to the date of the said Referendum Election. Such notice shall be in substantially the form of Exhibit B attached hereto.
(8) The Mayor and Council shall at the next regular meeting after the election, or at a special meeting, receive the results of the referendum election and make the same a part of the minutes of said meeting, whereupon if a majority of the votes cast were for the bond issue bonds herein provided for may be issued and sold as provided in Section 50 (b) of the City Charter, but if at such referendum election the majority of the votes cast were against the bond issue, then no bonds shall be issued nor shall any money be borrowed pursuant to the resolution submitted to the referendum.
The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to cause the aforesaid notice to be published as hereinbefore provided.
APPROVED by the Council of the City this 27th day of November 2000.
Vote: For
Against
City Clerk
APPROVED BY the Mayor of the City this ______ day of November 2000.
Mayor
City Clerk
ELECTION OF OFFICERS - ROBBINS HOSE COMPANY
The Fire Line Officers of the Robbins Hose Company are elected annually on the third Monday of November. Members were provided the results from the November 20, 2000 Robbins Hose Company Election for consideration.
Mrs. Malone moved for acceptance of the election results for Fire Chief, Donald Bates, seconded by Mr. Weller and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Gorman absent and Mr. Carey abstaining).
Mrs. Malone moved for acceptance of the election results for Deputy Fire Chief, Brian Bashista, seconded by Mr. McGlumphy and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Gorman absent and Mr. Carey abstaining).
Mrs. Malone moved for acceptance of the election results for First Assistant Chief, Jack Fortney, seconded by Mr. Truitt and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Gorman absent and Mr. Carey abstaining).
Mrs. Malone moved for acceptance of the election results for Second Assistant Chief, Robert Whedbee, seconded by Mr. Truitt and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Gorman absent and Mr. Carey abstaining).
Mrs. Malone moved for acceptance of the election results for Third Assistant Chief, Hays Grapperhaus, seconded by Mr. Truitt and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Gorman absent and Mr. Carey abstaining).
Mrs. Malone moved for acceptance of the election results for Fourth Assistant Chief, Trey Holland, seconded by Mr. Pitts and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Gorman absent and Mr. Carey abstaining).
Mrs. Malone moved for acceptance of the election results for First Fire Line Captain, Jonathan Osika, seconded by Mr. Pitts.
Responding to concerns of Mr. Weller, Mr. O’Connor explained that Mr. Osika was involved in the vandalism of Fire Station No. 2 several years ago and was penalized for his actions. Since he has fulfilled all obligations imposed by the Fire Company, he was reinstated as a firefighter and has now been nominated and elected to serve as an officer of the Robbins Hose Company.
Mr. Salters suggested a delay in action until further information is obtained and Council is given the opportunity to review the details of the incident and how it was resolved. He stated that although he has the utmost confidence in the Fire Department, he felt that it is Council’s responsibility to assure the moral integrity of the individuals elected to serve.
Mr. Pitts felt that since the Fire Department imposed their penalties, which were apparently served and the individual’s record cleared, and members have elected the individual to serve, Council should respect the wishes of the members of the Fire Department.
Concurring, Mr. McGlumphy felt it unfair to make comments when the individual is not present to make statements as to the actions of the past.
Council President Christiansen explained his reservations and felt that since Council is having this discussion, members of the Robbins Hose Company will know Council has concerns regarding the individuals elected to serve.
Mr. Truitt moved to table the matter, seconded by Mr. Salters. The motion failed by a vote of five (5) no and two (2) yes (Mr. Truitt and Mr. Salters) (Mr. Gorman absent and Mr. Carey abstaining).
On a call for the question by Mrs. Malone, the motion to accept the election results for the First Fire Line Captain, Jonathan Osika, was announced carried by a roll call vote of four (4) yes, two (2) no (Mr. Truitt and Council President Christiansen), and two (2) abstentions (Mr. Carey and Mr. Salters) (Mr. Gorman absent).
Mrs. Malone moved for acceptance of the election results for Second Fire Line Captain, Carl Yetter, III, seconded by Mr. Pitts and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Gorman absent and Mr. Carey abstaining).
REMARKS OF COUNCILWOMAN MALONE
In light of the recent comments made by Mr. Weller prior to the highschool football game between Dover High and Caesar Rodney, Mrs. Malone, Mr. McGlumphy, and Council President Christiansen gave a “defeat” presentation to Mr. Weller (graduate of Caesar Rodney High School), noting that Dover High defeated Caesar Rodney.
LEGISLATIVE AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT
The Legislative and Finance Committee met on November 13, 2000 with Chairman Salters presiding.
Discussion - Property Revaluation
Council President Christiansen explained that several years ago, Council had generally agreed that the City would perform property revaluations approximately every two (2) years. The City accomplished a property revaluation in the latter part of 1987 and 1990. A property revaluation has not been accomplished since 1990. Prior to 1992, the City Charter required an outside, independent reappraisal every 10 years. In 1992, the City Assessor requested that Section 47 of the Charter be amended to eliminate the mandatory nature of the provision and instead to commit the timing of such outside reassessments to the discretion of City Council. The request was based upon the City’s new capabilities to conduct in-house reassessments. This amendment was approved by City Council and the General Assembly. At that time, Council expressed a desire for the City to continue performing in-house reappraisals on a timely basis. Council President Christiansen advised members that an in-house property revaluation/reassessment has not been accomplished since 1990, nor has City Council requested a reassessment of all real property in the City by a certified independent outside appraiser in lieu of the valuation and assessment to be made by the Assessor. Therefore, he requested that the City Assessor submit a proposal for property revaluations/reassessments for consideration.
As requested, City Assessor Cooper provided information regarding property revaluations/reassessments, as follows:
Option I
Property revaluation cost, if conducted by private contractor, which includes exempt, commercial, and residential properties:
No. of Parcels - 10,000
Cost Per Parcel - $35.00
Total - Private Contractor Cost - $350,000
Option II
Property revaluation cost, if conducted by Assessor’s Office (in-house), which includes exempt, residential, and all commercial properties excluding 25-30 of the largest commercial properties. The cost per parcel includes a $60,000 fee for an advisor and a part-time temporary employee:
No. of Parcels - 10,000
Cost Per Parcel - $7.60
Largest Commercial Properties - $6,000
Total - Assessor’s Office Cost - $82,000
Mr. Cooper also provided a timetable for the revaluation, as follows:
January 2001 - January 2002 - Complete revaluation
February 2002 - Submit new values to Council for review and approval
March 2002 - Notices of new values will be sent to property owners
March 15 - April 30, 2002 - Informal appeals (to be decided by Assessor’s Office)
May 2002 - Formal appeals (to be decided by Appeals Committee)
During the committee meeting, Mr. Cooper explained that the costs for the reassessments are estimates only. He also suggested that Section 47 of the City Charter be amended by adding “all real property in the City of Dover be reassessed every three (3) years (in-house) by the Assessor’s Office, and that every third reassessment be conducted by a certified independent outside appraiser chosen by Council.” It was noted that Section 47 of the City Charter currently provides for a reassessment by a certified independent outside appraiser whenever Council directs.
Mr. Salters further explained that the City Assessor is not requesting approval of the expenditure of funds at this time. Upon Council’s authorization, bids will be solicited for review by the Finance Director and presented to the committee for review and recommendation to Council for final approval.
It was noted that staff recommended that in addition to an in-house reassessment being conducted every three (3) years, that every third reassessment be conducted by a certified independent outside appraiser chosen by Council. To clarify the matter, Mr. McGlumphy suggested that “in-house” be deleted from the proposed amendment, which would then require the Assessor’s Office to conduct a reassessment, with a certified independent outside appraiser being required to perform such reassessment every nine (9) years.
The committee recommended that the City Assessor be authorized to move forward with Option II, property revaluation to be conducted in-house and that there be an ordinance amendment that would require a revaluation every three (3) years, as suggested by staff, to be presented back to the committee for further review.
Mr. Salters moved for approval of the committee’s recommendations by consent agenda, seconded by Mrs. Malone and unanimously carried.
Proposed Ordinance Amendment - Abatement of City Real Estate Taxes
Mr. O’Connor reminded members that on July 10, 2000, Council adopted an ordinance that repealed Chapter 19.5, Article IV - Abatement of City Real Estate Taxes, of the Dover Code in its entirety. The ordinance was originally adopted in 1993 to establish a city-wide development incentive program in an attempt to provide incentives for such businesses to expand or locate in the City, which would create new employment opportunities for the citizens of Dover and ultimately strengthen the City’s tax base. However, it was recently felt that the tax abatement program was very broad and should be phased out, with consideration given to developing an ordinance that would be more specific to certain larger industries and businesses.
Mr. O’Connor stated that the proposed ordinance would require a qualifying industry to invest at least $1,000,000 and the facility to be located within the manufacturing or industrial park manufacturing zoning classification.
The committee recommended approval of the proposed ordinance amendment for abatement of City real estate taxes, as presented.
Mr. Salters moved for approval of the committee’s recommendation by consent agenda, seconded by Mrs. Malone and unanimously carried. (The First Reading of the ordinance will take place during the latter part of the meeting).
Proposed Ordinance Amendments - Rental Dwelling Permit Requirements and Business Licenses with Respect to Rental Agents
Mr. DePrima indicated that since the recent adoption of the Rental Dwelling Permit Ordinance, there have been several concerns relayed regarding the requirement for licensed rental agents when the property owner lives outside of Kent County. Several owners have indicated that they have family or friends caring for the property, which he feels meets the intent of the ordinance; therefore, he presented an amendment to Section 10-88 of the Dover Code that would create a “family and friends” exclusion to the license rental agent requirement.
Mr. DePrima also explained that there is a need to create a business license category and fee for those who professionally manage real estate but are not real estate brokers or sales agents. He presented an amendment to Section 11-1 of the Dover Code that would add a definition for “Real Estate Rental Agent”. A person holding this license would only be permitted to manage real estate and no other activities. He stated that the definitions for Real Estate Broker and Appraiser, and Real Estate Sales Agent that already exist would allow the licensee to be a rental agent in addition to the other activities permitted by these licenses. Mr. DePrima also presented an amendment to Section 11-4(d) of the Dover Code that creates a fee schedule for a Real Estate Rental Agent. The fee has been scaled to the amount of rental management the licensee conducts.
The committee recommended approval of the proposed ordinance amendments as recommended by staff.
Mr. Salters moved for approval of the committee’s recommendation by consent agenda, seconded by Mrs. Malone and unanimously carried. (The First Reading of the ordinance will take place during the latter part of the meeting).
Purchase of Command Post Vehicle and Special Operations Response Team Van
During the committee meeting held earlier this evening, members considered a request for the purchase of a command post vehicle and special operations response team van. In conjunction with the City’s Capital Investment Plan, an amount of $177,000 was included in the Police Department’s budget for the purchase of a command post vehicle and SORT van. The Police Department submitted a request to purchase the vehicles from the Sirchie Group, Vehicle Division, located in Medford, New Jersey; both fully equipped with the latest technology available, at a cost of $105,450 and $49,950 respectively. The base price for the command post vehicle, model MCV9000, is $96,036 including features required by the Police Department. Costs for additional equipment is $9,414, for a total cost of $105,450. The base price for the SORT vehicle, model SWAT9000-14, is $41,603. Cost for additional equipment is $8,347, for a total cost of $49,950.
Members were advised that the Sirchie Group was identified as the sole vendor/specialty supplier, offering complete vehicle design, all required equipment, and training on the use of the equipment. The Police Department previously purchased a surveillance van and an evidence processing van from the Sirchie Group and have been very satisfied with the vehicles and the services and support provided by this company.
The committee recommended approval of the purchase of a command post vehicle and SORT van from the Sirchie Group, Vehicle Division, located in Medford, New Jersey, both fully equipped with the latest technology available for these types of specialty vehicles at a cost of $105,450 and $49,950 respectively.
Mr. Salters moved for approval of the committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Malone and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Gorman absent).
Mr. Salters moved for acceptance of the Legislative and Finance Committee Report, seconded by Mrs. Malone and unanimously carried.
UTILITY COMMITTEE REPORT
The Utility Committee met on November 13, 2000 with Chairman Weller presiding.
Bid - System Operations Center Video Projector Screen
A major goal of the Electric Department is to improve the overall operation of the transmission and distribution system. The most effective method of improving system reliability is by reducing outage occurrences as well as minimizing outage extent and duration. The redesigning of the Electric Department Dispatch Center to a fully functional System Operations Center is the single most important task which will achieve this goal. One major component of the newly designed System Operations Center is a Video Projector Screen.
The purchase and installation of the Video Projector Screen is an integral part of the new System Operations Center. This installation will coordinate with the new SCADA System Master Station upgrade. These new systems will work together to improve system reliability by increasing data collection, expediting fault identification and isolation, minimizing outage extent and duration, and provide more accurate trouble crew dispatching.
Bids were solicited for the required hardware and software for the Video Projector Screen. Staff recommended that the bid be awarded to the low bidder, WH Platts Company, in the amount of $36,796.
The committee recommended approval of staff’s recommendation.
Responding to Mr. McGlumphy, Mr. O’Connor assured members that bids were reviewed by staff. Mr. McGlumphy commended Mrs. Mitchell, Finance Director/Treasurer, on her innovation in reviewing such requests of staff. With this review, it was his feeling that as a result, the City will begin to assume some enormous savings and urged all department heads and Chairpersons to continue with this review to be included in future action forms.
Mr. Weller moved for approval of the bid being awarded to WH Platts Company for the Video Projector Screen in the amount of $36,796, as the committee recommended. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Malone and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Gorman absent and Mr. Pitts abstaining).
Mr. Weller moved for acceptance of the Utility Committee Report, seconded by Mrs. Malone and unanimously carried.
FIRST READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCES
Mrs. Malone moved to waive the reading of the proposed ordinances before Council, seconded by Mr. Carey and unanimously carried. Council President Christiansen reminded the public that copies of the proposed ordinances are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers or can be obtained from the City Clerk's Office. Final action by Council on the proposed ordinances will take place during the Council Meeting of December 11, 2000.
Mrs. Malone moved for acknowledgment of the first reading of the following proposed ordinances, by title only, seconded by Mr. Carey and unanimously carried:
➔CHAPTER 19.5 - TAXATION, ARTICLE IV - ABATEMENT OF CITY REAL ESTATE TAXES
➔CHAPTER 10 - HOUSING AND PROPERTY MAINTENANCE, ARTICLE V - RENTAL DWELLINGS, DIVISION 1 - GENERALLY, SECTION 10-88 - AGENT REQUIRED
➔CHAPTER 11 - LICENSES, SECTION 11-1 - DEFINITIONS
➔CHAPTER 11 - LICENSES, SECTION 11-4 - LICENSE REQUIRED; FEE; SUBSECTION (d)
MONTHLY REPORTS - OCTOBER 2000
By motion of Mrs. Malone, seconded by Mr. Carey, the following monthly reports were accepted by consent agenda:
City Assessor Report
City Clerk/Alderman Report (Fines)
City Manager's Report
Mayor's Report
General Fund, Cash Receipts & Budget Report
Water/Sewer Fund, Revenue & Budget Report
Electric Revenue Fund, Revenue & Budget Report
Improvement and Extension Fund, Cash Receipts & Budget Report
Internal Service Fund, Revenue & Budget Report
In response to Mr. Weller, Chief Faulkner explained that the Dover Police Department hosted the Police Officer Executive Development Program, which is why several attendees were from the Dover Police Department as compared to other agencies.